Projects Researchers Publications Patents Monographs
 
 

Title: Observing and modelling the interaction between Indian Ocean, atmosphere and coastal seas (OMICS).

Project Leader:
Shenoi, S.S.C.


The state-of-the-art

A forecasting system has to exploit available observations and knowledge and build on the experience gained in forecasting in the past. In order to build a forecasting system for India, it is pertinent to examine the state-of-the-art in countries that have developed such systems, and to review the current status in India. The following description is based on the concept paper by Shetye and Radhakrishnan (2004).

The forecasting experience in Europe

The state of ocean forecasting that existed in Europe in the early 1990s has been described by Dugan (1993). By the early 1990s, several countries of the European Union had an operational forecasting system: United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Norway, and France. A major player in the forecasting system of all these countries was the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF).

The ocean variables that figured in the forecasts were tide (water level), storm surge, surface waves, water depth, and currents. The following were under consideration for inclusion in forecasts: water quality, pollution, and variables of interest to aquaculture and fisheries. The models that were used in tidal and storm surge prediction were typically two dimensional (covering the two horizontal dimensions) and were found to be reasonably accurate for water level predictions but not for water currents. For predicting wind waves, the model used most often was the one developed by Wave Modelling Group and usually known as WAM. The wind field used in the forecasts was provided by ECMWF using their fine resolution atmospheric model. In his evaluation of the forecasting systems, Dugan noted that the models used in the systems were comparable to the best available then.

There also existed a wide network of users of these forecasts (organizations involved in navigation, water quality, and safety, the offshore industry, fisheries and aquaculture industry, navies and coast guards), and these users were serious about the advice they received and provided real feedback to the developers and operators of the forecasting systems. In the early 1990s, Europe had plans to extend the forecasts to water quality, ecology, fisheries, aquaculture, sedimentation, and pollution.

The forecasting experience in the United States

The national organization identified for coastal ocean forecasting in the United States is the National Centre for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). Rao (2003) provides an overview of the present status of NCEP’s operational regional ocean forecasting systems for the US coastal domains. NCEP has been involved in the development of nowcast and forecast models for predicting the state of the US coastal oceans and implementing the models to produce daily forecasts on an operational basis.

As a first step in this direction, an area off the US east coast was chosen as the pilot domain to test the feasibility of producing coastal ocean nowcast and forecast fields on a daily basis in real-time. The model domain extended from approximately 26.5°N to 48°N and from the coast out to 50°W. This domain off the east coast was initially chosen because of the robust and identifiable signal provided by the Gulf Stream, which covers a major portion of the domain, and the availability of better atmospheric forcing compared to the US west coast.

The Princeton Ocean Model (POM) was used as a prototype to produce daily nowcast and forecast oceanographic fields. The horizontal resolution in the ocean model changed from 10 km near the coast to about 20 km offshore and the model had 19 sigma levels in the vertical. The prescription of open-ocean and landward boundary conditions was based on monthly climatologies. The ocean model was forced by surface fluxes derived from the Eta model, which is NCEP’s operational meso-scale meteorological model. Forcing due to three semi-diurnal and three diurnal tidal components were also included in the model. Assimilation of sea surface temperature (SST) data from in-situ and satellite sensors and the sea level anomalies from TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter and ERS-2 scatterometer was also included in the forecast system. The system produced a nowcast and a 48-hour forecast every day.

The oceanographic products produced by the POM-based system have been extensively evaluated internally by the Marine Prediction Center of NCEP and also by a group of selected marine users during two marine demonstrations projects conducted during the summer of 1999 and winter of 2000 (funded by the National Oceanographic Partnership Program (NOPP)). The nowcast-cum-forecast system for the east coast became fully operational at NCEP in March 2002. Graphic products and grid-point numerical fields are made available to the user community over the Internet.

Rao (2003) also points out that the then operational east coast system was limited in its geographical coverage and that improvements were needed in the prescription of the lateral open-ocean boundary conditions. In order to rectify these deficiencies, work is continuing on the development of basin-scale models to provide the means for extending the forecasting capability to other coastal areas of the US and to generate more realistic open-ocean forcing for these regional domains.

Elements of a coastal forecasting system

The experience of forecasters in the United States and Europe enables us to delineate the following as the essential elements of a coastal forecasting system.

  1. Basin-scale models that can provide the boundary conditions needed by the coastal models: a hierarchy of models is needed because there is an interaction between the coastal ocean and the open ocean, and the coastal models, which cover a smaller domain at a higher resolution, need to be provided with the conditions at their open-ocean end. These open-ocean boundary conditions are provided by models that are run over a larger domain (basin-scale models) but at a coarser resolution.

  2. Models of the coastal ocean and atmosphere with data assimilation capability: The coastal ocean model must incorporate the knowledge concerning behaviour of the coastal ocean. The atmospheric model must be able to provide forecasts of fields of winds, pressure, etc. Both these models must have the ability to assimilate data so that the simulated fields stay close to the observed.
  3. An observing system that provides crucial information to check the performance of the model(s). The modelling studies, in turn, often help decide observational strategy using these platforms.
  4. A set-up for dissemination of forecasts.
  5. A system to objectively evaluate performance of the prediction system and provide feedback on performance of the forecasting system.

    The relation between these elements can be depicted in a schematic.


Illustration 1: Schematic showing the relation between the different elements of a coastal forecasting system

The state-of-the-art in India

Given the above elements of a coastal forecasting system, we now describe the present state-of-the-art in India for each of these elements. We focus on the physical variables because we understand them much better than we understand other variables such as those related to the ecology of the coastal region. We examine, in turn, the models used in India, the observing systems available today, the dissemination of the forecasts being made now, and the user-feedback process currently in place.

Basin-scale models

During the last decade and a half, considerable progress has been made in understanding the currents in the waters around India ( McCreary et al., 1993; Shetye and Gouveia, 1998; Shankar, 1998; Schott and McCreary, 2001; and Shankar et al., 2002). This knowledge was the result of a series of observations, mostly relying on ship-based cruises, and modelling studies with a suite of models. Though the models ranged from very simple dynamical models to complex Ocean General Circulation Models (OGCMs), they had one feature in common: all these studies were simulations on the scale of the basin, typically modelling the entire Indian Ocean north of about 30°S.

These studies show that the current along the east or west coast of India (called East India Coastal Current (EICC) and West India Coastal Current (WICC) respectively) can be forced by events anywhere in the north Indian Ocean, stretching from the Asian landmass in the north to about 10°S. For example, if we want to explain the variability seen in a time series of currents measured off Goa, we cannot correlate the current merely to the local wind around Goa: the current off Goa, the WICC, is forced not just by the local winds, but is also affected by winds elsewhere in the basin. At the seasonal time scale (typically monthly-mean wind forcing and the resulting monthly-mean currents), the WICC off Goa is forced more by the winds blowing along the east coast of India than by the local winds. This phenomenon is called remote forcing: the cause (winds) of the observed behaviour (of, say, currents) is not local, but remote from the region where the (current) observation is made. This basin-wide integration is made possible by waves (that are distinct from the surface waves we see on the sea surface) that propagate long distances, transmitting the disturbance generated at a location to remote areas. The studies over the past decade show that this combination of local and remote forcing merges the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the equatorial Indian Ocean (down to about 10°S) into a single dynamical entity, the north Indian Ocean, which must be modelled as a whole to simulate the circulation even in its parts.

Hence, any modelling system that is used for the forecasting system has to cover at least this domain. Such a system can be built with just one model that covers the entire domain of interest, but the typical solution in such cases is to run two models, one with a somewhat coarse resolution, but at the scale of the basin (covering, say, at least the entire Indian Ocean), and the other at a much higher resolution, but over a limited domain covering the region of interest (say, the Indian EEZ). The former is a basin-scale model and the latter could be called a coastal-ocean or regional model. The coastal ocean is affected by the conditions in the open ocean. Hence, the coastal model needs the conditions at its open-ocean end, and these conditions are provided by the basin-scale model. Computational limitations usually preclude running the high-resolution model over the entire, larger domain.

The most popular basin-scale model is the Modular Ocean Model (MOM), which has a history stretching back to the 1960s. It has also been used extensively for simulating the circulation in the Indian Ocean. This rigorous testing over two decades, as exemplified in several research papers, makes MOM a leading candidate for basin-scale simulations.

Models of the coastal ocean

Models used for coastal forecasting include POM and the Regional Ocean Modelling System (ROMS). POM has been used for forecasting on the US east coast (Rao, 2003); ROMS has been used for modelling the California Current System on the US west coast. Both models are currently being used in India. Another model for coastal studies is MIKE 21, a commercial software that has been used for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies in the Indian coastal waters. The documented research using these models in the Indian seas, however, is meagre in comparison with that using basin-scale models like MOM. Also, it is only now that some groups in India are beginning to use models like ROMS in association with basin-scale models, with the open-ocean boundary-conditions from the larger-scale models being used as a forcing for the high-resolution, regional model.

A model, however, is only as good as are the forcing functions. In the Indian coastal regime, the two most important forcing functions are the tides and the winds; in some areas like the northern Bay of Bengal, river runoff will also be important.

For tides, a reasonably good database is available for the Indian seas (see, for example, Unnikrishnan et al., 1999).

The traditional source of gridded wind fields for the Indian research community has been the National Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF), New Delhi; other sources include ECMWF and NCEP. Before these products can be assembled into an ocean forecasting system, however, it is essential to test them extensively: ocean models need to be forced using these wind products and the model outputs compared with available observations. Such validation, necessary before a forecasting system can be assembled, is lacking in the Indian seas. There is also ample evidence that the quality of wind forcing in the region around India improves if the atmospheric models are run at higher resolution (see, for example, Roy Bhowmik, 2003), calling for a combination of meso-scale atmospheric models and Atmospheric General Circulation Models (AGCMs) (as required for the ocean) to generate the forcing fields needed for an ocean forecasting system.

There is, however, a dearth of data on the discharge of rivers into the seas around India. Discharge gauges are not installed on all rivers. Also, data on river discharge are often difficult to obtain. Both limitations make numerical modelling of river discharge, the models being forced by precipitation, an important, if auxiliary, element of an ocean forecasting system. In regions like the northern Bay of Bengal, into which flow the largest rivers of India, it is unlikely that a reasonable forecasting system can be assembled without this element. Hence, hydrological modelling forms a part of this programme.

A key component of modern oceanic and atmospheric forecasting systems is data assimilation. Models used for forecasting assimilate available observations in real-time to improve the quality of forecasts. Though some work on ocean data assimilation has been done in India, it is in a nascent state and cannot yet be included as an element of a forecasting system. Data assimilation capability is yet to be tested for the ocean models identified above. Hence, this is one area where considerable basic work has to be done before it can be integrated into a forecasting system for the Indian seas.

Observing system

Since the successful completion of the International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE) in the 1960s, India has made handsome investment in ocean research. Besides developing institutions dedicated to ocean research and teaching, the country has also invested in infrastructure for sustained observations of the ocean. The data from the observing system has two applications in the context of a forecasting system. First, the data are required to validate the model simulations: how good are the predictions? Thus, the observing system is required to provide the benchmarks for evaluating the forecasting system itself. This requirement calls for a carefully planned, sustained observational programme. Second, if the forecasting system includes data-assimilation capability, then the data have to be available in real-time or near-real-time in order to be assimilated into the models. At present, very few of the observing systems in India have this capability.

The components of the present ocean observing system that either have this capability or could be upgraded to this state are the following.

  • Moored buoys. The National Data Buoy Programme (NDBP) of the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), an institute funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), maintains about 20 moored buoys at present in the waters around India; there are plans to increase this number to 40. These buoys measure oceanographic and surface meteorological variables, including wind speed and direction, (ocean) current speed and direction, sea surface temperature (SST), air temperature, barometric pressure, etc. Some of the buoys also record thermal structure in the upper ocean and transmit the data in real-time using communication satellite systems.

  • Sub-surface moorings. In addition to the moored buoys deployed by NIOT, NIO is deploying sub-surface moorings with current meters and ADCPs (Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers) under this programme on enabling a forecasting system for the Indian seas. Unlike the NIOT buoys, these buoys are anchored at the bottom and current meters and an ADCP (looking up) are deployed on the mooring line. These moorings, being deployed for long-term current measurements in the Indian EEZ, are part of the observational component of this programme on building the science underlying a forecasting system.
  • Drifting buoys. The drifting buoys are used primarily to measure SST, but they often include other sensors. The Indian drifting buoy programme, which launches about __ buoys every year, is operated by the National Institute of Oceanography (NIO), Goa, with funding from the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS).
  • ARGO floats. A recent advance in near real-time in-situ observation of the thermohaline structure in the upper 2000 m of the ocean is the system of profiling ARGO floats. The international community has a global array of 3000 ARGO floats. India has contributed 160 floats to this global programme. The Indian ARGO programme is coordinated by INCOIS.
  • Expendable bathythermographs (XBT). XBTs, launched from ships-of-opportunity, measure the temperature profile along its route. Three major lines are being operated by India at present: Mumbai to Mauritius, Chennai to Port Blair, and Port Blair to Kolkata; an extensive XBT survey was also launched in the southeastern Arabian Sea during the ARMEX (Arabian Sea Monsoon Experiment) programme. The present Indian XBT programme (operated by NIO and funded by INCOIS) does not have the capability for real-time transmission. It can, however, be upgraded to transmit data in near real-time or even real-time.
  • Tide gauges. The Survey of India, Dehra Dun, operates a network of about 25 tide gauges in major ports of India. Not all have real-time transmission capability, but can be upgraded to have this ability.
  • Meteorology. The India Meteorology Department (IMD) operates a network of meteorological observatories, coastal radars, etc. as a part of its weather forecasting system. Much of these data are available on the Global Transmission System (GTS) used worldwide for meteorological forecasting.
  • Satellite observations. The Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) at present operates one satellite, Oceansat I, dedicated to ocean observations. There are plans to have a second satellite, Oceansat II. The most important sensor for coastal forecasting is the ocean colour monitor (OCM), which can play an important role in coastal fishery and ecology forecasts. In addition, there are other satellites, operated by other countries, whose data are available in real-time or near-real-time. For an ocean forecasting system, the most important amongst these satellites provide SST (for example, AVHRR and TMI), sea surface elevation (Jason), surface winds (QuikSCAT), and rainfall (TRMM).


The observational platforms listed above provide a reasonable starting point for assembling a credible observing system for coastal ocean forecasting.

Dissemination

At present, INCOIS maintains a website for dissemination of its forecasts for potential fishery zones, tidal currents in the Gulf of Khambhat and Bombay High region, swells in the Indian Ocean, and ocean surface wind wave field forecasts. The Indian tsunami warning system is also housed at INCOIS. In addition, INCOIS has worked on other means such as electronic bulletin boards to disseminate the forecasts. The INCOIS website is the only Indian site at present that keeps ocean-related forecasts.

Feedback

There have been some attempts at providing to INCOIS feedback on its forecasts of potential fishery zones. However, as of now, our forecasting effort is limited and so are the mechanisms for generating well-thought-out feedback to the forecasts.


Summary

The elements of the coastal forecasting system that existed in Europe in the 1990s are similar to the state-of-the-art in India today. The US state-of-the-art at the turn of the century provides a viable goal for the Indian forecasting effort: it provides a perspective on where we might want to be in the future (Shetye and Radhakrishnan, 2004).

 

Back